The importance and application of Balanced Scorecards in Hospitals.
ORGANZIATIONAL AND MANAGERIAL PERFORMANCE
What is Organizational Performance?
Organizational
performance can be termed as “The actual results or
output of an organization as compared to its desired output or results”.
Organizational performance measures are taken to ensure that this difference
between the intended and actual results is kept as minimum as possible, keeping
in view that the desired objectives do vary from actual, due to changing
circumstances.
Organizational performance covers three
areas of an organization’s outcome, which are its products market performance, financial
performance and shareholders return. In case of hospital this concept would
include return on investment made also. Also the beneficiaries should get
benefit from the confidence reposed by them in the trustees of the trust.
What is Managerial Performance?
Managerial Performance, in general and
also for a private hospital would include patient’s satisfaction over the
long-term, maximizing confidence of the patients, maximizing return on
investment and securing long term well-being of the organization.
Measures of Organizational and Managerial Performance
The measures of organizational and managerial performance
enhance the strategic planning along with the operations of an organization.
Also the measures would help improve the financial matters. Organizational and
managerial performance measures would also have an impact on legal matters
arising if any ,like in cases of assault and other related legal matters, what
standard procedure would be followed at managerial level and also the
organizational level. Budget would be allocated appropriately if the measures
of organizational and managerial performance are adequate. The measures improve
the customers/patients satisfaction, staff satisfaction and are important to
promote good will of the organization along with innovation, creativity, staff
performance and profitability of the organization and the organizations without
these measures would be without clear aims and objectives and lesser customer
satisfaction would accrue.
BALANCED SCORECARD APPROACH
Advantages of Balanced Scorecard Approach
The balanced scorecard which is usually termed
as a tool for performance management, is a semi-standard structured report sustained
by design procedures and automation , that can be used by managers to keep
record of the execution of work done and other related activities by the staff ,within
their control and to monitor the consequences arising from these activities. One
main objectives of the Balanced Scorecard is the consistent transformation of
visions into strategies, objectives and measures and are typically designed to
monitor business process. Balanced scorecards are usually being used by
government agencies, non-profit organizations, and schools. One of the common uses
of balanced scorecard is to support the disbursement of incentives to
employees.
Balanced Scorecards can be implemented through methods
based on email, phone calls and office software, so it provides an advantage in
the form of easy access. One other advantage of using this approach is that it alerts
the managers about areas where performance deviates from intended results and
they can be encouraged to divert their attention on these areas, and as a result
initiate improved performance within the part of the organization they lead. In
case of a small private hospital the advantage would come in the form of a report
of work done and other associated activities by the staff which
includes doctors, management and nursing staff.
One of the advantages of this approach is that it helps
focus managers divert their attention on strategic issues and the management of
the implementation of strategy and moat importantly recognition of financial
and non-financial measures and assigning tasks to them, so that when they are
reviewed, it is feasible to determine whether existing performance meets the anticipations.
Other advantages would include translating the vision into operational goals,
interconnecting the vision to individual performance, planning the hospital
business and feedback from the doctors and other staff and adjusting the
strategy accordingly. Some other advantages that would accrue from the use of
balanced scorecard approach would be better organizational and strategic
alignment.
Disadvantages of Balanced Scorecard Approach
One of the disadvantages of Balanced
Scorecard is that it has no role in the formation of strategy but they co-exist
with strategic planning systems and other tools. Also the
methods of gathering and reporting balanced scorecard information can be labor
intensive and is likely to face procedural problems i.e. getting all relevant
people to return the information within the required date
In complex organizations, where
there are several balanced scorecards to report and there is a need for
co-ordination of results between balanced scorecards i.e. if one level of
reports depends on information collected and reported at a lower level, then
the use of individual reporters is problematic. Empirical nature of framework
of this approach also attracts criticism from academic community. There is lack
of citation support which adds to the disadvantages of this approach and it
also does not provide a bottom line score or a unified view with clear recommendations
i.e. it is solely a list of metrics. Another disadvantage of this approach is
that it based upon the principle of shareholders being the ultimate purpose, so
other stakeholders deem to be undervalued. Also it cannot be determined what
the organization would have achieved if the change had not been made, so it is problematic
to attribute changes observed over time to a single intervention. In case of a
small private hospital this approach would confine itself to doctors which are
deemed to be the major stakeholders, which would end in other stakeholders
being undervalued
BALANCED SCORECARD FRAMEWORK
JUSTIFICATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Ø Financial Perspective
The measures relating to return to
shareholder’s or trustees on the investment made for constructing and operating
a private hospital is an important area of organizational and managerial performance.
Cost and equity management along with the shareholder’s return at an
appropriate level will be an important measure of organizational and managerial
performance.
Ø Patients/Customers Perspective
For a small private hospital the
customers who are usually the patients should be satisfied and doctors should
be available in emergency and should be well known to deal every patient’s
condition.
Ø Internal Process and Employee Growth
Measures of organizational and
managerial performance should be like, the team of doctors and employees should
be given positive feedback. Employee coordination should be encouraged and
objectives of the hospital generally and in the perspective of doctors, owners,
trustees, beneficiaries should be the primary focus for better organizational
and managerial performance.
IMPLEMENTATION & EVALUATION
Implementation
The measures of organizational and managerial performance can be implemented
through
methods based on email, phone calls and office software, so it provides an
advantage in the form of easy access. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
software can also be used for the implementation of methods of organizational
and managerial performance
Monitoring
These methods can be monitored
through proper balanced scorecard approach. The comparison should be done on
regular basis whether the intended results deviate as to how much from the
actual results
Reviewing
The review can be made by a balanced
score card on the feedback provided by doctors and patients of the performance
measures already adapted.
Evaluation
Evaluation of the performance
measures can be done by the comparison of score card giving the comparison of
objectives, strategies, initiatives and the deviation of actual results from
the intended results.
STAKEHOLDERS AND OPINION
There are three kind of stakeholders
in a hospital .These are characterized as internal, interface and external
stakeholders.
INTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS
- Ø Management staff
- Ø Professional staff
- Ø Non-professional staff.
INTERFACE STAKEHOLDERS
- Ø Hospital staff
- Ø Medical board of trustees
- Ø Tax payers
- Ø Other contributors
EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS
- Ø Suppliers
- Ø Patients
- Ø Third party payers
- Ø Financial community
OPINION
The medical staff admits the patients and provides many services to a small
private hospital so it makes them the most important stakeholder in a hospital.
The doctors keep shifting between hospitals and patients so their relationship
can be best characterized as mutually dependent though they are an important
stakeholder having a very important view about the performance of the hospital
but cannot be considered as the only stakeholders having legitimate view about
the performance of the hospital.
|
Nice
ReplyDeleteamazing
ReplyDeletesource of info